News
Why do technology investments fall short?

Change management as ‘a training and communications exercise’
Eagle Hill said organizations reporting stronger returns start with the work rather than the technology, measure changed behaviour rather than usage alone, and manage adoption as an ongoing discipline instead of a one-time project.
“Many organizations treat technology change management as a training and communications exercise,” Jezior said. “The organizations that realize the greatest return on technology investments take a different approach.”
Mike Hughes, group service director and an executive board member at Scotland-based Peak Scientific, outlined a similar approach in a column published Sept. 29, 2026, by TCI Media, the publisher of HPCwire. Hughes wrote that his team classified its artificial intelligence (AI) program as a change management initiative rather than an information technology (IT) deployment before requesting a budget.
“When we built our AI initiative, we treated the technology selection as the last decision, not the first,” Hughes wrote.
IT rollout versus change initiative
Hughes wrote that the two models measure success differently. “An IT rollout is done when the software is live and stable. A change initiative is done when behavior has actually shifted, when the workforce has adopted a new way of working and kept using it after the initial excitement fades,” he wrote.
Read the full article here

News4 days agoEEOC hits Oklahoma hotel chain with pregnancy harassment lawsuit
News5 days agoAI made expertise abundant. Here’s what became scarce instead
News4 days agoLas Vegas call center denied every disability accommodation request for years, EEOC claims
News4 days agoBlind engineer alleges developer axed him hours into first day
News5 days agoFraud hits employer-jobseeker trust in hiring, report finds
News5 days agoHiring for values: how Aurora builds culture across a global workforce
News4 days agoNvidia unveils platform to prevent AI agents from going rogue
News4 days agoStarbucks to close around 250 underperforming stores in North America




















