News
Legal Aid Society faces class action over its own disability accommodation process

The shift Kubicki challenges came after she sought to amend her accommodation. The complaint states she submitted updated documentation on November 24, 2025, and a comprehensive amended request on December 9, 2025. What began in August 2025 as a one-hour court-presence instruction directed at two Bronx social workers became, the filing alleges, an expectation applied only to Kubicki that she remain in court for as long as seven hours a day and confer with two supervisors before leaving. Kubicki alleges the employer used the interactive process to expand her job duties rather than evaluate whether she could cover court from the office across the street.
While the request was pending, the complaint says, no interim accommodation was put in place. Kubicki alleges she fell ill twice in December 2025 – a stomach virus on or about December 3, and a week-long upper respiratory infection on or about December 22 – and that the second illness forced her to pause immunosuppressive treatment. She says her health has deteriorated significantly since. According to the filing, she now uses a wheelchair, is largely bedbound, and cannot tolerate screens. She remains employed by The Legal Aid Society on medical leave.
The complaint also describes a January 28, 2026 court appearance Kubicki was directed to make. According to the filing, the client she was sent to meet said, in sum and substance, “I’m shocked you would pull me out of my cell to talk about this.” Kubicki argues the in-person requirement was not tied to any client need.
The case names individual HR and supervisory defendants under the New York City Human Rights Law, which permits personal liability. Park is alleged to have participated in the January 20, 2026 denial meeting and reaffirmed the seven-hour expectation. The complaint alleges that Laura Walsh, a senior employee relations specialist, administered the process and held the line on extended courthouse presence. Two social work supervisors and the director of social work for the criminal defense practice are named on similar grounds.
Kubicki pleads ten causes of action under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the NYCHRL, including failure to accommodate, retaliation, interference and intimidation, medical inquiry violations, and failure to engage in a cooperative dialogue. The filing seeks to certify four classes covering Legal Aid employees in New York City who, since May 11, 2023, had disability-based requests denied or partially denied, faced job-duty changes within 75 days of asking for accommodation, waited more than 45 days for a written determination, or were asked for new medical records on already-documented conditions. The complaint also alleges the organization routed parts of the accommodation process through a third-party administrator, Reliance Matrix, on its behalf.
Read the full article here

News7 days agoNevada review board can publish police officer names and badge numbers
News7 days agoThe Chief People Officer who merged HR, tech to drive transformation
News7 days agoIs the HR business partner role done? Here’s what could replace it
News7 days agoTherapist sues UPMC, alleges year of failed disability accommodations
News7 days agoERISA blocks providers’ suit over La-Z-Boy plan reimbursement
News4 days agoOffering a reassignment process may not satisfy religious accommodation duty
News3 days agoGoldman Sachs partner unveils ‘real danger’ in working with AI
News5 days agoAI skills race driving coworker competition, report finds




















