News
Former Pfizer physician challenges RIF, OWBPA disclosures in court

The most consequential allegation centers on the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, which sets conditions for waiving age-discrimination claims in group layoffs. Nieto says she signed a Separation Agreement on February 12, 2024 after being told the required disclosures—including a Schedule A listing the decisional unit, job titles, and ages of those selected and not selected—were complete and accurate. Five days later, on February 17, 2024, she received a revised Schedule A that, she alleges, added or corrected information about individuals in the decisional unit, including ages and titles. She contends the company did not restart the required consideration and revocation periods after issuing the corrected disclosure.
Read the full article here

News4 days agoOffering a reassignment process may not satisfy religious accommodation duty
News4 days agoGoldman Sachs partner unveils ‘real danger’ in working with AI
News3 days ago‘Bad blood on both sides’: Canada hits back with tariffs up to 50%
News5 days agoAI skills race driving coworker competition, report finds
News4 days agoHow close are robots to replacing human workers?
News4 days agoWells Fargo loses retaliation appeal after firing salesman seeking remote work
News4 days agoAlabama court overturns bus driver’s firing over a defective notice
News3 days agoCanada retaliates with 50% tariffs on over 700 U.S. products




















