News
Employee listening: AI reads your Slack but can’t say why

What only asking can tell HR
Robin Erickson, head of human capital research at The Conference Board in New York, says passive data stops at the pattern. “Employee surveys matter because they ask people to interpret their experience,” she said. “Slack and other networks can identify patterns, but it can’t really tell an organization why those patterns exist.”
Her example is turnover rising from 8% to 10%. Nobody can say whether one poor manager caused the rise until a survey asks employees whether they plan to stay two more years, and why. AI now groups open-ended answers into themes that teams once tallied by hand. “AI does that automatically,” Erickson said.
Surveys also expose perception gaps no activity log records. In The Conference Board’s Reimagined Workplace study [add year, link and share of workers], few workers believed their employer weighed AI-related skills in promotions, and their answers diverged from those of HR leaders, Erickson said. “If the leaders are using AI-related skills for promotion decisions or performance reviews and employees don’t know that, it will definitely create a sense of discontent,” she said. Tying AI-based measures to ratings also invites gaming, as Amazon workers gaming the AI leaderboard that HR built showed. Erickson’s first rule for any survey: “Don’t ask any questions in any surveys about things you’re not willing to change.”
A 2×2 for deciding what to fix
Burton tells clients to use indirect listening wherever possible and to “ask employees very directly when it’s an issue that justifies interruption.” The bar is high. Gartner research found more than 60% of employees say organizational change has them working harder than usual, she said [name Gartner report and date]. Direct questions earn their place when the issue is critical to business strategy, depends on context, will inform a major decision and is realistic to act on.
To sort what employees raise, Burton plots each issue on a 2×2 grid. The horizontal axis is impact on both the business and the employee experience. The vertical axis is the complexity of the fix. Issues on the left half get acknowledged and deferred. The lower right holds visible quick wins with high impact and low effort. The upper right holds bigger bets that need longer strategic planning.
Read the full article here

News6 days agoRyanair slows hiring as it braces for €2bn fuel hit
News7 days agoA U.S. giant just collapsed spectacularly. What that teaches employers about succession planning
News6 days agoU.S., Canada dominate global AI talent: report
News6 days agoNational Guard member sues Wells Fargo, alleges firing over military duty
News6 days agoAI’s productivity payoff is real but narrow. The bigger jobs test may come with the next downturn
News7 days agoNearly 60% of CEOs plan to replace a senior leader within six months
News6 days agoCanva job cuts affect 1,271 roles in first redundancy round
News6 days agoMillions of employees are ‘faking it’ at work under AI pressure




















