After his deployment, a veteran says King County halved his pay then fired him

According to the complaint, the county hired him as an entry-level sheriff’s deputy in January 2023 with full knowledge of his National Guard commitments. He had disclosed his service during the background investigation, and county representatives confirmed they understood their obligations under USERRA, the filing says. 

The friction began, the complaint alleges, when he gave notice of a deployment set for October 2023. Supervisors “expressed frustration,” according to the filing, and held him back from field training that September – reasoning, the complaint says, that it made no sense to advance him weeks before he shipped out. The filing also claims that a supervisor, told the deputy had spent a weekend teaching Taser and pepper-spray classes to soldiers, “responded dismissively”: “No one gives a fuck.” 

He deployed from late October 2023 to mid-February 2024 – about four months, well inside USERRA’s five-year ceiling, the complaint notes. The return is where the case sharpens. The filing alleges the county placed him on half-pay for roughly six months, from February through August 2024, even though he was ready and willing to work. When he pressed to come back in July 2024, the complaint says, he was left in limbo. 

From there, the complaint describes a series of assignments it casts as punitive. He was allegedly required to repeat post-academy training that, the filing says, no other returning servicemember had to redo. He was handed a vehicle nearly 19,000 miles past the county’s own retirement cutoff, according to the complaint. He was placed in an “experimental” posting usually staffed by seasoned deputies and, the filing alleges, funneled almost entirely into low-level paperwork while colleagues made arrests. 

In January 2025, according to the complaint, a supervisor told him too much money had been spent retraining him after his deployment. Days later, on January 13, 2025 – two years to the day after he was hired – the county terminated his employment. The termination memo gave no specific reasons and noted that, as a probationary employee, he had no right to grieve the decision, the filing states.