News
Businesses rush to rehire staff after regretted AI-driven cuts

What would they do differently?
According to the findings, 41.2% of HR leaders said they would approach the AI-driven redundancies differently if given the chance.
Another 50.3% said they would make selective changes, such as rethinking which specific roles were cut, rather than overhauling the entire approach.
Over half of HR leaders said that up to a quarter of roles that were made redundant could have been transitioned to a different role with the right redeployment support in place.
Another 28.3% of HR teams said 26% to 50% of roles had redeployment potential.
Despite the redeployment potential, 55.1% of the respondents said reskilling and redeployment were not formally discussed or considered.
Read the full article here

News6 days agoRyanair slows hiring as it braces for €2bn fuel hit
News7 days agoA U.S. giant just collapsed spectacularly. What that teaches employers about succession planning
News6 days agoU.S., Canada dominate global AI talent: report
News6 days agoNational Guard member sues Wells Fargo, alleges firing over military duty
News6 days agoAI’s productivity payoff is real but narrow. The bigger jobs test may come with the next downturn
News7 days agoNearly 60% of CEOs plan to replace a senior leader within six months
News6 days agoCanva job cuts affect 1,271 roles in first redundancy round
News6 days agoMillions of employees are ‘faking it’ at work under AI pressure




















