News
Worker says Amazon fired her over leave dispute, blocked her rehire

Amazon then flagged the wording, format and signature on those documents and opened an investigation, the complaint alleges. In an August 2024 email, an investigator told her Amazon had contacted her provider and been told there was no record of the paperwork, according to the filing. The complaint also alleges Amazon’s own verification records referred at one point to a July 19 visit rather than the June 19 appointment – which, in the worker’s account, raises doubt about whether Amazon checked the right date.
The timeline is where the leave questions sharpen. The filing says Amazon gave her about three calendar days to produce verification sent straight from a provider – far short of the seven days the complaint says the law allows to fix a questioned form – and contacted her provider before she had a real chance to sort it out herself. She scrambled to get supplemental records sent, the complaint says, and was hospitalized in August 2024.
On September 3, 2024, Amazon approved several stretches of medical leave and short-term disability benefits, according to the filing. Three days later, it fired her for what the complaint calls “alleged falsification of leave documentation,” leaning on wording it viewed as “atypical” and a document format it called “inconsistent” rather than any evidence she forged or altered a record.
The firing was not the end of it. The complaint alleges Amazon attached a five-year no-rehire label to the termination, turned down a fresh application on March 28, 2026, canceled a scheduled hiring appointment, and told her she could not reapply until September 2029. The worker says the no-rehire flag was applied automatically, with no individualized check of whether she could do the job. She also alleges that, while she was employed, an Amazon trainer told her mother – an Amazon worker at the time – that she was “slow” and “can’t be on their team.”
Her claims run under the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Nevada Fair Employment Practices Act, covering both the 2024 firing and the later refusals to rehire. A related disability-discrimination and retaliation charge she filed in May 2026 is still pending with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Read the full article here

News5 days agoSSA sheds 7,000 jobs as court rejects disability access challenge
News5 days agoAI adoption challenges HR leaders to rebuild the entry-level pipeline
News4 days agoEmployers cutting weight loss drug coverage get a capped option
News4 days agoJob hugging still widespread despite career trade-offs, report finds
News3 days ago‘We don’t do accommodations’ – worker sues TD Bank over FMLA firing
News3 days agoCybersecurity giant faces lawsuit after new dad’s ratings nosedive
News5 days agoDoxing claim against Top Dawg Entertainment struck after label named accusers
News5 days agoTwo-thirds of Microsoft’s H-1B approvals went to existing staff




















