UPS supervisor sues, alleges company stalled his accommodation then fired him

From here, the story will feel familiar to anyone who runs an accommodation desk. The complaint says he first tried to return to work with accommodations in January 2025, after his disability case manager relayed that his restrictions could not be met and that he should ask a division manager about openings. He emailed that manager in February 2025 about a role in a division where he had worked before, the filing says. No reply came.

So he went through the company’s formal ADA process. He had a first call with a UPS ADA human resources representative in April 2025 and finished a documentation meeting over Zoom that May, according to the complaint. Then, the filing says, the line went quiet. He alleges a single September 2025 voicemail told him UPS had not found a position but was still looking – and that was the last meaningful word he got.

The next news about his job, the complaint says, arrived as a December 31, 2025 email telling him to log in and start offboarding. When he called to ask why, the filing states, the representative told him his termination had already been finalised on December 24 – before anyone notified him. A letter followed in January 2026, describing an administrative separation after more than twelve months away from work.

Two points are worth an HR reader’s attention. The complaint alleges UPS never told him the request had been denied, never identified the vacant jobs it had supposedly weighed, and never restarted the conversation. And after he was gone, the filing says, he found the company had marked his status as “retired” – though he says he never retired, filed no paperwork and received no severance.

The retaliation claim reaches back further. In 2024, according to the complaint, he used the UPS Ethics Hotline to report what the filing calls harassment and a hostile work environment created by his direct manager. The filing alleges that manager denied him support, disciplined him over tasks he says he was never trained on, and berated him in front of the people he supervised; it says two part-time supervisors in his area quit over the conditions, one walking off the job. The complaint claims that Ethics report and his later accommodation requests were factors in how UPS treated him and in his firing.