News
Trump admin asks Supreme Court to get mass layoffs executed

But the Justice Department argued in its filing to the Supreme Court that the “Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing.”
“The president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers,” it added, as quoted by Reuters.
It further argued that the order interferes with the Executive Branch’s internal operations, CBS reported.
“More concretely, the injunction has brought to a halt numerous in-progress RIFs at more than a dozen federal agencies, sowing confusion about what RIF-related steps agencies may take and compelling the government to retain — at taxpayer expense — thousands of employees whose continuance in federal service the agencies deem not to be in the government and public interest,” the filing read, as quoted by the news outlet.
Block to Trump’s plans
Trump’s plan for large-scale workforce cuts was announced in February. It led to various federal agencies cutting their workforce, or making plans to do so, before the Illston block.
Read the full article here

News4 days agoOffering a reassignment process may not satisfy religious accommodation duty
News5 days agoAI skills race driving coworker competition, report finds
News4 days agoHow close are robots to replacing human workers?
News4 days agoWells Fargo loses retaliation appeal after firing salesman seeking remote work
News4 days agoAlabama court overturns bus driver’s firing over a defective notice
News3 days agoWhat are the top emerging risks for businesses today?
News4 days agoGoldman Sachs partner unveils ‘real danger’ in working with AI
News3 days ago‘Bad blood on both sides’: Canada hits back with tariffs up to 50%




















